Uh...are you guys really buying that his bird flew the gun into a tree?
Look, even if his bird was actually strong enough to do that and he was dumb enough to not dispose of it himself in front of an audience, why is he being such a dick about it? Let's say his story is somehow true - it means that someone got a hold of his revolver and used it during the murder.
Knowing how close he is to May, don't you think he'd be frantic to find whoever took it instead of just saying she must be the killer?
Stiles, I quit trying to make sense of anything Gundam says long ago. That's why I keep asking him to just explain things! [yelling in Gundam's general direction, before turning back to Stiles] in an understandable way.
Frankly, I don't buy that he just so happened to dispose of the gun without knowing for sure it was destroyed. It seems like a highly illogical, even for him.
This is a guy who fooled everyone into thinking no one had found the gun and carved a panel into his wardrobe to hide it. You might think he's illogical, but he's actually pretty damn smart - smart enough to be able to get rid of a gun if he really wanted to. His behavior doesn't add up.
...Looks can be deceiving. And it is strange how open he is to letting May take blame, after they were always so close to one another.
Then there's the matter of his alibi: or rather the lack of alibi. He also claims that he won't enter the chapel because it's too holy or what the hell ever. If he's so wrapped up in his delusions, I don't know if he would go inside to kill Beat.
Gundam being Gundam and playing up his eccentricities is the best way to ensure that we'll buy the theory that he killed Beat afterwards. We won't hesitate to execute him rather than May since it wasn't in self-defense.
But no one seems to believe May killed him anyway. With a thirty minute time gap where she was unconscious, anything could have happened! If he's trying to defend May he's doing a lousy ass job of it because no one seems to buy that she did it anyway.
If the true culprit is Gundam and he manipulated the evidence to make it appear as if it were May, he's doing an even worse job of protecting himself.
In any case, it's entirely irrelevant to what actually happened. The facts are as follows: Gundam had a gonne. The bullet in the altar most likely came from that gonne. Therefore, Gundam's gonne was used in the crime.
One more fact - Gundam's bandages are a lot shorter today, and a long strip of bloodstained cloth about the length of his former bandages was found wrapped around a rock in the pond.
I don't know, I'm not a vet. What I do think is that getting your bird to dump a gun somewhere you don't know in a murder game is the stupidest plan I've ever heard of. You're a lot of things, but that's not one of them. And I think that even if you were that stupid, you'd care a hell of a lot more about where that gun wound up than you do now.
You were the only one who had a revolver. I don't buy that anyone managed to take it from you or got hold of a second one, not with the way you're acting. You must have used it in the chapel.
Whether you used it to shoot Beat...we'll see once Lithuania gets the body here. Now that we know what we're looking for, it shouldn't be hard to tell whether he'd been shot. [That said, he's pretty damn sure Gundam shot Beat, because why else would there be a bullet at the scene of the crime? He just doesn't want to admit it yet.]
I also think that if you're the type of person who'd frame a ten-year old girl who obviously admires you for your own murder, you wouldn't be behaving this suspiciously. You'd be acting like you were just as frantic to find who 'stole' your gun as the rest of us.
If you were a good enough actor to fool us all into thinking you genuinely cared about May, then you'd be a good enough actor to fake being worried about your missing gun. Hell, you could have easily said the real killer broke into your room and found it and people would have bought that more than the bird. I don't see why you had to shoot Beat at all actually when you knew Susan and I knew you had the only revolver in the house.
The fact that you're not denying any of our suspicions believably at all makes me think there's something more going on here.
Hilarious. Stilinski, it is so pathetic. You are so ignorant. Your trust is unwarranted. Have I ever pretended it was not? Have I ever claimed to care for May Chang at all? It is not my "acting" that fooled you, it is your assumptions.
I do not feign helplessness to succeed at my aims. I would not pretend there existed an individual capable of besting me and taking my arms, because such an individual does not exist.
Your logic twists in circles because you are so determined to prove I am no villain. But I am, Stiles Stilinski. I have always been a villain. I have never claimed otherwise. I am Gundam Tanaka, the scion of apocalypse, fated enemy of all mankind. Do not think to underestimate to me or ascribe to me emotions I am incapable of.
It kind of seems that way, but he had to have been in the chapel and used the gun. I can't think of any other reason why we'd find a bullet there belonging to a revolver only he owned.
There was something red that might have been blood where the bullet hole was. It looks like someone tried to wipe it away, but assuming it's blood, the gun could have been used on Beat.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
productions) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
murdermanor2013-11-07 09:26 am
no subject
Look, even if his bird was actually strong enough to do that and he was dumb enough to not dispose of it himself in front of an audience, why is he being such a dick about it? Let's say his story is somehow true - it means that someone got a hold of his revolver and used it during the murder.
Knowing how close he is to May, don't you think he'd be frantic to find whoever took it instead of just saying she must be the killer?
no subject
Frankly, I don't buy that he just so happened to dispose of the gun without knowing for sure it was destroyed. It seems like a highly illogical, even for him.
no subject
no subject
Then there's the matter of his alibi: or rather the lack of alibi. He also claims that he won't enter the chapel because it's too holy or what the hell ever. If he's so wrapped up in his delusions, I don't know if he would go inside to kill Beat.
no subject
Gundam being Gundam and playing up his eccentricities is the best way to ensure that we'll buy the theory that he killed Beat afterwards. We won't hesitate to execute him rather than May since it wasn't in self-defense.
no subject
no subject
In any case, it's entirely irrelevant to what actually happened. The facts are as follows: Gundam had a gonne. The bullet in the altar most likely came from that gonne. Therefore, Gundam's gonne was used in the crime.
no subject
One more fact - Gundam's bandages are a lot shorter today, and a long strip of bloodstained cloth about the length of his former bandages was found wrapped around a rock in the pond.
no subject
He said something to me about that on the day of the murder. Some nonsense about his left arm no longer being sealed.
no subject
...okay, new fact. I don't know what exactly he was doing, but Gundam was definitely at the scene yesterday and he's definitely involved somehow.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Haha. Ahahaha. You are such a fool. It is hilarious! You know nothing of me, and yet you presume so much!
no subject
I'll vote for you or for May or for anyone else if the evidence points that direction. Now do be quiet.
no subject
[Going back to ignoring.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
All right. Then what do you propose?
no subject
Whether you used it to shoot Beat...we'll see once Lithuania gets the body here. Now that we know what we're looking for, it shouldn't be hard to tell whether he'd been shot. [That said, he's pretty damn sure Gundam shot Beat, because why else would there be a bullet at the scene of the crime? He just doesn't want to admit it yet.]
no subject
[He is still smiling like a smug asshole, but he seems a little less hostile.]
no subject
I also think that if you're the type of person who'd frame a ten-year old girl who obviously admires you for your own murder, you wouldn't be behaving this suspiciously. You'd be acting like you were just as frantic to find who 'stole' your gun as the rest of us.
no subject
I am not behaving any differently than I always behave. If you believe otherwise, whatever you believe of me, you are not very observant.
no subject
The fact that you're not denying any of our suspicions believably at all makes me think there's something more going on here.
no subject
Hilarious. Stilinski, it is so pathetic. You are so ignorant. Your trust is unwarranted. Have I ever pretended it was not? Have I ever claimed to care for May Chang at all? It is not my "acting" that fooled you, it is your assumptions.
I do not feign helplessness to succeed at my aims. I would not pretend there existed an individual capable of besting me and taking my arms, because such an individual does not exist.
Your logic twists in circles because you are so determined to prove I am no villain. But I am, Stiles Stilinski. I have always been a villain. I have never claimed otherwise. I am Gundam Tanaka, the scion of apocalypse, fated enemy of all mankind. Do not think to underestimate to me or ascribe to me emotions I am incapable of.
no subject
no subject
no subject