The Directors (
productions) wrote in
murdermanor2013-09-26 10:49 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
week 1 - trial

[At 9 AM precisely, the old grandfather clock chimes once again, and the doors to the drawing room are opened. They will remain open until everyone has come inside, after which they will shut behind them. It is not possible to leave on your own, although perhaps if you have a specific purpose the hostess will allow you to go. The room is set up comfortably, with several tables by the fireplace set out to assist with the trial. The Hostess will also remain in a seat near the fireplace, next to the scales on the mantle. At lunch, the doors will open to bring in a large meal on an automatically rolling buffet, and at 3 PM, tea and finger sandwiches will be served. You'll be able to enjoy the trial in comfort, of course, but the information cards set out on tables will not allow you to forget your true purpose here.]
no subject
Stiles said that he found her door partly open. That doesn't seem in keeping with a teenage girl.
So if we assume that the killer left the door open, was it carelessness or a desire for the crime to be desired sooner? Anyone looking in might have noticed her chair missing, and with the care the killer took to lock the bathroom door...
no subject
Perhaps they needed it open to modify something about the room. As Lydia's keys were still in the bathroom, closing the door would remove any access.
no subject
What I mean is, wouldn't someone have thought that was odd, that her chair was missing and the door left partially open. Lydia likely wasn't the sort to volunteer her own chair to change lightbulbs.
How long would the killer need to do all this, anyway? It sounds more and more like a planned and targeted murder.
no subject
If the open door is important, we again arrive at the idea that the murderer wanted to create a natural situation where they would be one of the first on the scene.
no subject
[ STILES. BAD STILES. NAUGHTY STILES. ]
Are we absolutely positive that one of the suspects is truly the killer? Could the hostess be lying in order to throw us off?
[ But really, what's the likelihood of that? As untrusting as Sharon is, what reason would the "show" or whatever have to leave the killer out of the lineup? ]
The symbol on her hand didn't really look like an S, though. A curved line, sure, but the curves weren't severe enough for them to be considered an S in most circumstances.
no subject
Uh, hey? Person whose name also starts with an S and who's actually a suspect unlike some people around here? Yeah, I didn't go to her room until after I heard Lydia was dead, and it was to make sure the killer didn't get there first and try to mess anything up. I also wasn't ever in there alone - you can ask Kanaya, she'll back me up. I waited outside the door until she showed up and we went in together.
I don't know why it was open though. It could just be that the killer overlooked it or didn't bother since it wouldn't be a clue anyway.
no subject
[ And yes, Stiles, her name starts with an S and she's a suspect. Thank you. But as has already been determined, only, what, two of the suspects even admit to knowing Lydia? And Sharon isn't one of them. She has absolutely no motive. ]
And back to my earlier question, what else could the symbol have been? Like I was saying to Susan, it doesn't look like an S. Since you were in her room, did you see anything that might have been similar?
no subject
The victim was fluent in ancient Latin, which seems to be a language of some sort. Could it be an archaic symbol?
And no, this would be even more of a farce if one of us were not the true killer. I think we should strike the idea from our minds - it will only serve to distract.
no subject
I don't think we should be focusing that much on what it could mean though, it could be anything. Maybe she scribbled on her hand before she was killed because she wanted to make sure of what color it was, that's a thing girls do with make-up right? We should be asking two other things instead.
[He holds up a finger.] First of all, was Lydia the one who actually wrote it or was it the killer? If it was the killer, we're just wasting our time and playing right into their hands.
Secondly, if it was Lydia, then when did she get the chance to write it? If the killer knocked her out first before drowning her, she obviously wouldn't have been able to write anything. If they didn't, then why wasn't there any sign of a struggle anywhere or any marks on her body? The killer could have cleaned up the crime scene, but there should still be bruises or scratches or something on her. I doubt she was so focused on scribbling some weird symbol on her hand that she wouldn't have tried to fight back.
no subject
Let's presume that the mark is significant. After all, the missing chair seemed insignificant until it was used to block the bathroom door. The missing piano wire was likely used to help close a door or keep the doors from locking behind them. I'm not sure which - I'd have to try and see if either were possible. Had anyone else tried?
[ She pauses as a thought occurs to her. ]
Could it be a musical symbol? Or part of one? We haven't found the piano wire yet. Maybe the killer has some sort of obsession with music?
no subject
Wow, know doesn't even sound like a real word to me anymore. Anyway, if she did draw the symbol - which I still don't think so but whatever - it has to be something that would point out the killer that we'd all kn--understand.
no subject
no subject
no subject
It could be a red herring, or obsessive-compulsive behavior, or, as you said, a signature. And yes, several of them strike me as that kind of person.
But I've been a government agent for years now and I apparently view the world with more suspicion than other people.
[ But come on. Clyde's excuse had been his hair. Bernkastel had been in transit during the possible murder time and might have been able to pull it off. Marlow had ingratiated herself into the investigation pretty quickly - her knocking on the bathroom door could have been a ruse. And Susan? Susan is clever. All Sharon knows for sure is that she herself didn't murder the girl, and she's seen too much to believe anyone is incapable of murder. ]
no subject
...where was I going with this?
no subject
I see the information cards provide a satisfactorily well-rounded description of us after all.
no subject
...yeah, I got nothing.
no subject
The symbol is nothing I recognize musically, not even from the sheet music I've seen over the years.
I'm only a bass player, but I haven't seen it for vocal or percussion either. The only thing I can think of is that weird shape on the body of a violin... but that looks more like a 'f' than a 'S.' Even then, that wouldn't be related to the piano, minus that they both require strings to be played.
no subject
The only thing weird about her room was the missing chair, nothing else stood out. Whatever the symbol is, I don't think it's going to be that obvious either. If it is supposed to be an S, then I'll bet anything it was planted there to frame someone or throw us off the track. Even if Lydia had somehow been awake when she was being murdered, the killer would have seen it and washed it away if it was a clue leading to them.
If it's not supposed to be an S, then I have no idea. Maybe she chose to write something more vague so the killer wouldn't try to erase it. That still doesn't explain when she had the chance to do so though.
no subject
no subject